Boeing protest heard loud and clear
The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Air and Land Forces met to discuss the contract award protest filed to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) by Boeing and the future of the KC-135 aerial refueling tanker. Ranking committee member Jim Saxton (R-Nj.) said that he was not going to advocate Boeing or Northrop Grumman, the Los Angeles based corporation that secured the 35 million dollar contract from the Department of Defense (DOD). Boeing filed a protest with the GAO after they lost the contract to Northrup Grumman.
Deputy General Counsel for the GAO, Daniel Gordon testified. He said that Boeing raised a number of challenges to the contract between the DOD and Northrop Grummon. As a result the AGO conducted a five-day hearing, in which 11 witnesses from the DOD testified. At that point, Gordon said, it was understood that the air force made numerous errors that could have affected the outcome between Boeing and Northrop Grumman.
Saxton said that the most important thing is that the aging aerial refueling tankers are replaced. He said that it is imperative to get new tankers out to the “war fighters” as soon as possible.
Leave a Reply
Categories
Related
- Conservative coalition calls for oversight of tanker contract
- DoD spokesman: Tanker fleet is ancient
- Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff discusses some particulars of SBInet at a news conference held in the Ronald Reagan Building
- McCain’s emphasis on competition led to selection of the “wrong aircraft”
- Daniel Levin: Three minutes of water boarding is inaccurate


